The
Benchmarks
|
Benchmark Type |
PC-100 |
PC-133 |
| Quake 2 Demo1
800x600 |
120.8 |
120.0 |
| Quake 2 Demo1
1024x768 |
83.5 |
84.0 |
| Quake 2 Crusher 800x600 |
77.3 |
77.5 |
| Quake 2 Crusher 1024x768 |
71.1 |
71.0 |
| Quake 3 Demo 1 |
57.5 |
57.6 |
| Quake 3 Demo 2 |
77.3 |
77.7 |
| Unreal 800x600 |
48.8 |
48.8 |
| Unreal 1024x768 |
45.2 |
45.5 |
| 3D Mark 99 Max
800x600 |
4866 |
4866 |
As you can see, there's nearly no
performance difference between PC-100 and PC-133 RAM, unless you can see the
difference between less than one frame per second. Given these kind of results,
there really is no reason to get PC-133 RAM over PC-100 when running at bus
speed below 133Mhz.
The main reason for getting PC-133
RAM is of course, overclocking. To do the overclock test, I put the RAM into the
Project 620 system (which now runs an Abit BE-6 motherboard), removed the
P3-500 that was in it and replaced it with the unlocked P2-300 and set the
multiplier to 2X. I'm not really trying to overclock the CPU. I'm trying to find
the max bus speed the RAM would still work at.
I then discovered that my Viper
Ultra would not work on 133Mhz bus. The reason for this is because the Intel BX
chipset on the Abit BE6 doesn't allow a 1/2 AGP divider for the video card. You
can only chose between 1 to 1 or 2/3. Setting the AGP divider to 2/3 means the
AGP bus is running at 89Mhz when using the 133Mhz bus. Most AGP cards will not
work at this level. What I end up doing was putting in an old 4 meg S3 Virge
video card into the PCI slot. At 133Mhz bus, the PCI speed is divided by 4,
which mean it's running at 33Mhz. Not problem for a PCI device. Here are the
overclocking results.
| Bus
Speed |
PC-100 |
PC-133 |
| 105x2=210Mhz |
100% stable |
100% stable |
| 110x2=220Mhz |
100% stable |
100% stable |
| 112x2=224Mhz |
100% stable |
100% stable |
| 115x2=230Mhz |
100% stable |
100% stable |
| 120x2=240Mhz |
100% stable |
100% stable |
| 124x2=248Mhz |
100% stable |
100% stable |
| 133x2=266Mhz |
100% stable |
100% stable |
| 140x2=260Mhz |
Registry error |
100% stable |
| 150x2=300Mhz |
Failed to boot |
Registry error |
The Micron PC-100 RAM was stable up
to 133Mhz. This is really good for PC-100 RAM, but then again, the Micron RAM is
really PC-125 RAM. The Corsair PC-133 RAM is stable at up to 140Mhz bus.
The main problem with this setup is
that most AGP cards will not work at this kind of bus speed. I know the Intel
i740 card can run with the AGP bus set to 100Mhz, but who in their right mind
would take an i740 over a Viper Ultra? Even if the RAM can work at over 133Mhz,
it's no good if your video card won't. This problem should be fix when Intel
release their i820 chipset.
My conclusion is this. Good quality
PC-100 RAM will be enough for most overclocked system. You should look at the
CPU you're running and buy your RAM according to that. In the case of my Celeron
that runs at 605Mhz, even average PC-100 RAM will do as the bus speed will only
be 110Mhz (110x5.5=605Mhz). If you are using a PIII-450 or another low
multiplier CPU, then you should get high quality PC-100 or PC-133 RAM. Fellow
LAN party guy, MickŪ has his PIII-450 running at 580MHz (129Mhz X 4.5) with
Micron PC-100 RAM and it's 100% stable. The system will work at the 133Mhz bus
but the Viper Ultra will lock the instant he fires up a 3D game.
While the Micron PC-100 and Corsair
PC-133 RAM will allow you to operate at or over 133Mhz bus, it's pretty useless
trying to playing Quake 3 on a S3 Virge. :-)
A month ago, I would always
recommend PC-133 RAM over PC-100 RAM because the price difference was like just
$5. However the gap in price is getting wider, nearly $30 now. Weather or not
PC-133 is worth this extra money is up to you. If you're thinking of future
upgrades, then it's worth it, as the new i820 chipset will make full use of it.
Also you have to consider that I use very high quality PC-100 RAM for this
comparison. Most PC-100 RAM will not work at 133Mhz.
Return Home
[Page 1]
[Page 2]
[Page 3]